Whose thought is it anyway? Part II.
In the second part of my article you can read on respective decisions of different courts from all over the world and the conclusion on intellectual property rights of composers.
In the second part of my article you can read on respective decisions of different courts from all over the world and the conclusion on intellectual property rights of composers.
Authors and creators live by their works. As long as they are alive, they take measures to ensure that their message to their audience is interpreted according to their original intentions. If not, they are pleased to see in how many different ways their faithful audience receives them and their thoughts.
A cinematographic work is one of the most sensitive examples of shared intellectual property, as cinematographic works are inevitably born within a working community of its creators and financers.
When trying to understand the motivation behind the choice of jurisdiction in which companies wish to exist and operate, we may need to look further than the obvious reasons. As Tamás Szabados puts it, the answer to the question on such motivation is simple: „It depends”[1].